Skip to content

EpiC Blog

PEPFAR, USAID, MOSAIC
  • Home
  • About
  • Global Impact
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Social & Behavior Change
    • Mental Health and Psychosocial Support
    • HIV Trainings, Tools and Guides
    • Decentralized Drug Distribution
    • HIV Success Stories
    • HIV Country Resources
    • COVID-19 Trainings, Tools and Guides
    • COVID-19 Success Stories
    • COVID-19 Country Resources
  • Follow Us
Search
  • Home
  • About
  • Global Impact
  • Events
  • Resources
    • Social and Behavior Change
    • Mental Health and Psychosocial Support
    • HIV Trainings, Tools and Guides
    • Decentralized Drug Distribution
    • HIV Success Stories
    • HIV Country Resources
    • COVID 19 Trainings, Tools and Guides
    • COVID-19 Success Stories
    • COVID-19 Country Resources
  • COVID-19
  • Follow Us

Failing forward: Five lessons from building a virtual training and network of HIV prevention advocates

November 10, 2021

Aubrey Weber, Technical Officer, Science Facilitation, FHI 360
Casey Bishopp, Technical Officer, Science Facilitation, FHI 360


During our team’s efforts to develop the virtual HIV Prevention Ambassador Trainers’ Workshop and network of Ambassador trainers—to “do virtual better”—we inevitably hit some bumps and, at times, failed. As with any new endeavor, some of our best laid plans succeeded, while others did not work out as intended. Furthermore, the global COVID-19 pandemic presented unique challenges for us all. We persevered through our ongoing and iterative virtual training process and learned five critical lessons. Here, we present those lessons honestly to help others working in HIV prevention, and the global health and development sector more broadly, who might be struggling to adapt to delivering trainings or strengthening capacity in a virtual environment.

Lesson 1: Prioritize the end user in every decision you make.

This might seem obvious, but it is easier said than done. Early on, we realized our workshop could be approached as an ongoing learning ecosystem—where learning is available anytime, anywhere, on any device. Our facilitators, mentors, and participants were all working virtually, and we could quite easily connect directly with our participants before, during, and after the training dates. So, during and in between trainings, we asked them what they wanted and needed to learn to feel confident going into their communities to train Ambassador trainers. Similarly, we asked them what they did not need—in which topics they were already well-versed. With each subsequent training, we got better at prioritizing information gathering during every step of the process. Putting the end user first resulted in customized trainings with sessions that addressed the exact needs of the participants.

Lesson 2: Do not think of virtual sessions as online versions of in-person events.

We knew we could not simply put content into a PowerPoint and call the training successful, so we started from scratch with the virtual experience in mind. As trainers, we make the bold assumption that participants are tuned in, listening, and following the material. Because this is not always true (and multitasking is much easier in a virtual space), we had to stretch ourselves beyond the traditional webinar format, involve participants often, and incorporate interactive components into our curriculum to guarantee engagement. Content-heavy slide presentations were guaranteed to lead to multitasking and distracted learners, so we incorporated review games, breakout groups, and polls to maximize engagement. The feedback we received after the training showed this worked. It was a tricky balance, though. If we went too heavy on style, we could lose our audience due to lack of substance.

Lesson 3: Invest time and resources into sustainability.

Managing and supporting a successful, sustainable virtual network is a full-time job. One of the major challenges of training is ensuring the learning continues afterward and the lessons are reinforced in a sustainable way. This was a hurdle we wanted to overcome because, too often, a solid plan is not in place. In truth, building out our extended network of Ambassador trainers was the biggest challenge of all. Our mentorship network model addressed this head-on, and along the way, we learned just how much time, energy, and effort must go into providing effective post-training support to participants. Ideally, this work should be prioritized at every stage. No matter how you design your post-training follow-up, it requires the same continuous attention as planning and conducting the training itself. This time investment ties the training together and is more likely to create a sustainable, beneficial network of learning and mentorship.

Lesson 4: Iterate, iterate, iterate.

We used the Successive Approximation Method (SAM) to design and deliver our virtual training program. This approach allowed for continuous improvement with limited disruption. We were able to “fail forward,” putting less pressure on ourselves for perfection right out the door. We have had a better training program with each iteration because of our collective agile mindset.

Measuring success is complicated when it comes to in-person training and learning and even more so for virtual programs. Through our iterative process, we have added elements, such as the mentoring program, that we believe will strengthen learning outcomes, and dropped or streamlined elements, such as pre-work, that did not show clear results. And because we continue to iterate, we will continue to have lessons to learn and share.

Lesson 5: Build a better team.

We formed our training team with intention—around a group of excellent, seasoned HIV prevention trainers in Eastern and Southern Africa. Going virtual facilitated this process, and it has truly been a case of the whole being greater than the sum of its parts. Additionally, having a point person to coordinate, create, and cheer on the team made a huge difference. Our team of facilitators and mentors has focused on an idea we call capacity partnering. To us, capacity partnering means we celebrate creativity and difference, we maximize each of our unique training strengths, and we support one another to lead. It also means that we have prioritized giving ourselves and our partners grace while competing professional and personal priorities—many related to the pandemic—have taken hold. Capacity partnering has proven to be our greatest and most impactful lesson.

This is the ninth and final blog post in a series on the design, development, implementation, and iterative processes of the interactive and virtual HIV Prevention Ambassador Trainers’ Workshop, led by the U.S. President’s Emergency Plan for AIDS Relief (PEPFAR)- and the United States Agency for International Development (USAID)-supported Collaborative for HIV Prevention Options to Control the Epidemic (CHOICE) through the terms of cooperative agreements of the EpiC and RISE projects. In this series, we share our experience and reflect honestly on the ups and downs of designing and delivering a comprehensive training virtually. Access the HIV Prevention Ambassador Trainers’ Workshop materials here.

Share this:

  • Post

Post navigation

Previous

Social enterprise: Using market-driven approaches to meet the needs of key populations

Next

In memoriam: Dr. Ly Penh Sun

Get Subscribed

Enter your email address to subscribe to this blog and receive notifications of new posts.

We don’t spam! Read our privacy policy for more info.

Check your inbox or spam folder to confirm your subscription.

Archives

Search by Category

Recent Publications

  • EpiC HIV Factsheet
  • EpiC COVID-19 Factsheet
  • EpiC Global Health Security Factsheet

Follow Us

  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Link

This blog is managed by the EpiC project and dedicated to sharing stories, events, and resources from HIV epidemic control efforts around the world.

© EpiC BLOG 2022

Assessment

A questionnaire or “screener” meant to be used with individual patients in a clinical setting to screen for, help diagnose, or monitor progress for individual mental health conditions.

Intervention

Larger packages or broader-reaching resources that describe actions or activities to be implemented. These may be appropriate for individuals, groups, and/or programs.

Anxiety

Feelings of fear, dread, and uneasiness that may occur as a reaction to stress. Anxiety can be a symptom or a feeling; it can also be a clinical diagnosis of a mental health condition.

Burnout

A state of emotional, physical, and mental exhaustion caused by excessive and prolonged stress, typically related to one’s work, that is not managed well. Burnout is considered an occupational phenomenon.

Clinical diagnoses

Mental or neuropsychiatric disorders, or disruptive, unusual, or maladaptive behaviors that have been evaluated and diagnosed by a trained medical professional.

Depression

A mood disorder that causes a persistent feeling of sadness and loss of interest.

Disability

A physical or mental condition that limits a person’s movements, senses, or activities.

Insomnia

A sleep disorder, or disordered sleep pattern, characterized by trouble falling and/or staying asleep.

Overall well-being

The state of being comfortable, healthy, or happy; judging one’s own life positively; generally, “feeling good.”

Post-traumatic stress (PTS)

A normal adaptive response to traumatic or stressful life events that can result in a wide range of distressing symptoms. Post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) differs from PTS and is a clinical diagnosis.

Self-efficacy

An individual’s belief in their capacity to act in the ways necessary to reach specific goals.

Self-harm/suicidality

Deliberate injury to oneself as an emotional coping mechanism, ranging from cutting oneself to suicide. Expressions of self-harm and/or suicidality are usually considered an emergency and should be assessed and managed by a trained professional.

Social support

The perception that one is cared for, has assistance available if needed, and that one is part of a supportive social network.

Stress

Any type of change to one’s internal or external environment that causes physical, emotional, or psychological strain. “Managing stress” is an effort to return from this state of strain or disturbance to homeostasis or well-being.

Substance abuse

Use of a substance (usually drugs or alcohol) in amounts or by methods that are harmful to oneself or others. Substance use disorder (SUD) and addiction are distinct clinical diagnoses.

Trauma

Lasting biopsychosocial and/or emotional response that often results from experiencing a terrible event such as an accident, crime, military combat, or natural disaster, or a series of chronic traumatic events like persistent abuse or neglect.

Program beneficiary

Individual who receives program services; an entire group or population may be the recipient of services.

Service provider

Individual who directly provides services to another individual, group, or population (the “program beneficiary”) through a program.

Privacy Policy

START TYPING AND PRESS ENTER TO SEARCH